NATO Powers Preparing To Turn Ukraine Into Another Afghanistan

In a provocative statement on March 6th, 2022, Jewish Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said the US had given the “green light” for Poland to deliver fighter jets to Ukraine, promising that the US would replace any fighters that the Poles send to the Ukrainian government. This came after Ukraine’s Jewish President Volodymyr Zelensky demanded more weapons and aid in a Zoom call with the US congress on March 5th. Zelensky also demanded that the US declare a no-fly zone over Ukraine, which would oblige the US military and NATO allies to shoot down Russian aircraft and would thus be tantamount to a declaration of war on Russia.

While it is unlikely at this stage that the US will engage in direct warfare with Russia, the groundwork is being laid to prolong the fight against Russia indefinitely by sending shipments of weapons from nearly all NATO states into Ukraine. President Biden has reportedly asked congress for $10 billion in aid for Ukraine, $4.8 billion of which will be to cover the cost of US troop deployments to countries on the Ukrainian border and restock weapons the Pentagon has already sent to Ukraine. This is on top of a $200 million “lethal aid” package the US approved in December and another $350 million package approved last week. These appropriations include Javelin anti-tank missiles and Stinger anti-aircraft missiles. Between 2014 and 2021, the US sent $2.5 billion in “lethal aid” to Ukraine.

European governments have joined the US in pumping Ukraine full of weapons. According to a NATO statement:

Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, the United Kingdom and the United States have already sent or are approving significant deliveries of military equipment to Ukraine. Ukraine has already received critical weapons, including Javelin missiles and anti-aircraft missiles, from NATO Allies, as well as millions of euros of financial assistance.

The German government broke with their longstanding policy of not sending weapons to active war zones by sending 500 Stinger missiles, 1,000 anti-tank missiles and 400 rocket-propelled grenade launchers to Ukraine. The Germans also approved the shipment of nine German made Howitzer cannons from Estonia, a move which it had previously blocked. Sweden and Finland have pledged 5,000 and 1,500 anti-tank missiles respectively, along with rifles, ammunition and field rations.

In a particularly Orwellian move, the European Union pledged €450 million euros from the “European Peace Facility” to reimburse member states for any weapons they send to Ukraine. The Facility was established in 2021 to fund a potential conflict with Russia and has a total of €5 billion euros pledged by member states through 2027.

In total, at least 17,000 anti-tank weapons have been shipped from the West into Ukraine in the last week. In addition to weapons shipments, the US and NATO allies have been encouraging their citizens and veterans to go and fight as irregulars on behalf of Ukraine. There can be no doubt that Western funded mercenaries are already operating inside of Ukraine. The purpose of all this is to bog down and delay Russian forces and make the conflict last as long as possible.

On March 7th, the NY Times published a report in which several military experts claim that the Russians are demoralized and on the brink of defeat. While loaded with unsourced claims that the Russian military is emotionally devastated by losing elite units to the plucky democratic rebels of Ukraine, these experts inevitably admit that they have no real evidence for such conjecture and acknowledge that a Russian victory is inevitable in the long run.

To be sure, most military experts say that Russia will eventually subdue Ukraine’s army. Russia’s military, at 900,000 active duty troops and two million reservists, is eight times the size of Ukraine’s. Russia has advanced fighter planes, a formidable navy and marines capable of multiple amphibious landings…

In January, Foreign Policy published an assessment by two policy analysts at the Rand Corporation stating that US weapon shipments to Ukraine, specifically anti-tank missiles, would not alter the outcome of a war with Russia. Given that all experts agree that whatever setbacks the Russians may be suffering, the outcome of the war is inevitable, shipping weapons into the war zone and prolonging the conflict is morally reprehensible. What purpose can such a policy serve other than to get more people killed and turn Ukraine into a hellscape? The likely reason is that the US and NATO want to weaken Russia over the long term with a protracted guerrilla war, no matter the horrific consequences this would have for the Ukrainians they pretend to care so much about.

Since the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 23rd, the Jewish controlled media apparatus in the West has whipped up anti-Russian ethnic hatred and war fervor among increasingly unhinged wealthy and aspirational upper middle class segments of American and European society. An atmosphere of grandiosity, hysteria and detachment from reality has permeated mainstream coverage and social media discourse for the last two weeks.

The absurd figure of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a comedian known for homoerotic toilet humor, has been recast as “the great communicator” and even more ridiculously, as a reincarnation of Winston Churchill! Whatever one thinks of the notorious British drunk and warmonger, the comparison is simply preposterous. However reprehensible his policies were, Churchill was known as an acerbic and witty orator who wrote dozens of books over his lifetime on politics, history and military strategy. Zelensky was known for pretending to play the piano with his penis.

This level of derangement and the personality cult of the odious Zelensky are being deliberately cultivated to foster political support for rejecting negotiations with Russia and turning Ukraine into a munitions dump to draw out the conflict. The aim is to bog Russia down in a protracted guerrilla war across half of Ukraine, effectively turning it into another Afghanistan.

In the 1980s the US funded and armed Afghan tribesmen to thwart the Soviet invasion of that country, a move which had disastrous long term results for the entire world. This policy lead to 40 years of near constant civil war in Afghanistan and the spread of Jihadist terrorism globally. According to the US government itself, the funding of the Mujahideen in Afghanistan played a role in the 9/11 terrorist attacks, which in turn lead to the ruinous 20 year US occupation of Afghanistan in which over 70,000 Afghans and 2,500 American troops were killed, 20,000 Americans troops were wounded, and which cost an estimated $5.8 trillion. Ultimately, the US fled the country last fall, leaving it in the hands of the same Taliban government they had promised to remove from power in 2001. What was the point of it all? So far, no one in US foreign policy circles has been able to answer that question. No one has even bothered to try.

Repeating this policy in the Ukraine would be catastrophic. In addition to the constant threat that the conflict could spiral into World War III, the inevitable result will be death and suffering for Ukrainians and Russians, a refugee crisis for Europe and further economic hardship for Europeans and Americans.

The National Justice Party calls for an immediate end to the escalation of the conflict in Ukraine and an immediate halt to all weapons shipments into the country. If Russian victory is inevitable, as everyone agrees, negotiations with Russia for a peaceful resolution must begin in good faith as soon as possible. Further use of Ukraine as a staging ground for provocations and black ops against Russia must end. The National Justice Party, as outlined in our platform, stands for a peaceful foreign policy and an end to foreign military entanglements.